Yet while the Equality Act is a significant and important tool for advancing equality, there are important gaps in the protection it offers on age. Our new report, Left Out by the Law, explores these gaps and what needs to be done to address them writes Jemma Mouland, our Deputy Director of Ageism & Inequality.
The exception within equality law
Last year, we pulled together a range of experts to discuss how age is treated differently in the law, why this matters and what could be done to make the protections stronger. This was inspired by the Women and Equalities Committee inquiry into the rights of older people, which highlighted how ageism is deeply embedded in UK society, including in how the law operates.
Put simply, unlike other forms of discrimination, some types of age discrimination can be lawful if it can be ‘objectively justified’ – in other words, you can be treated differently because of your age if this treatment pursues a legitimate aim and is proportionate.
The result is a legal framework that sends mixed messages. On one hand, it recognises age discrimination as harmful. On the other, it treats age discrimination as more acceptable, or easier to justify than other forms of discrimination.
More than a legal issue
As our report explores, this matters because this different treatment can make it much harder to challenge discriminatory practice. It also makes it hard to understand your own rights. The result is that very few age discrimination cases are ever progressed, despite age discrimination being widely experienced.
But it also matters because laws do more than regulate behaviour. They reflect social values and help shape public understanding of what is fair, normal and acceptable.
The ability to justify age discrimination can reinforce an underlying assumption that decisions based on age are inherently reasonable.