In my role, I meet amazing people doing great work to make their communities and services more age friendly, ensuring older people are not being actively discriminated against or left out of major decisions that could affect their lives.
However, I would challenge anyone, no matter how well intentioned, who says that they do not hold ageist attitudes. The negative associations with older age and ageing are so pervasive that it's impossible to completely avoid internalising these views. This then influences how we think about ourselves, now and in the future, and about older people.
Where do these views come from? The answer to this is complex but there is no doubt that media plays a huge role in influencing us and our views of ageing.
If you look at newspaper coverage and how it talks about age, sadly there is much that raises the issue in dubious and unhelpful ways and which implicitly or explicitly reinforces limited assumptions and negative portrayals of older people.
Many articles use people’s ages even when it is irrelevant to the content and purpose of a story, for example: Carol McGiffin, 62, dazzles in a sequinned biker jacket with her husband Mark Cassidy, 40, as they join Linda Robson at Best Heroes Award.
Why has age been included in this story? Is it done to evoke ageist assumptions about people’s looks and relationships which the journalist does not want to articulate? What does telling us their age add to what we want or need to know about them?