We know we have a crisis in the poor quality of England’s homes. In the past, there are many interventions that have been tried, failed, succeeded in some areas and not others, been abandoned and revisited. We wanted participants in the Good Home Dialogue to build on these solutions, and gave them five example policy interventions to learn from and build on:
- Safe Homes Regulation
- Housing Quality Investment Fund
- Green Loans
- The Local Good Home Hub
- Home MOT
Having spent time getting up to speed with the solutions, questioning expert speakers and sharing their own experiences, participants were quick to identify key challenges in putting into place the policy options. For example, while regulation was initially attractive to participants for the certainty it seems to provide, this was felt to be more appropriate in the private rented sector than in a privately-owned home.
Participants were also quick to point out the responsibility of government, landlords and housing associations in improving the quality of homes. This was particularly the case when discussing home improvements that were seen as part of a government agenda, for example those with environmental benefits.
Responsibility to action improvements was also often connected to financial ability to pay for home improvements. Participants were likely to consider their ability to fund home improvements based on their income, as opposed to their home equity. As a result, many participants argued that older people and those on low incomes need financial support, even if they own a valuable property.
In the context of these challenges, participants thought about what they’d want to see in any future policy solutions to improve the quality of homes. Participants told us they wanted to see: